10-24-2012, 06:20 PM
At 6:07 PM on 9/11/12 the CIAs email said
" Ansar al- Sharia claims responsibility for Benghazi attack....embassy Tripoli reports the group claimed responsibility on Facebook and Twitter and has called for an attack on Embassy Tripoli."
THAT report has not been disputed. It has been verified by other intelligence agencies and agents who were watching live feeds of the attack and who were monitoring "chatter" from known terrorist groups.
Obama's "no acts of terror" speech made no direct reference to Benghazi, but even if you assume that is what he was talking about, WHY was the Obama team's video story the one that was promoted for weeks after the attack?
And why is it that the only ones pushing the video story were members of the WH team? Even the press was not touting that story (except perhaps MSNBC).
You supposed intelligent and open minded liberals here do not even question what is going on. You still buy Obama's video lie. I'm disappointed that you accept everything Obama says as true. Did you fact check the BS he put out during the last debate? Probably not.
Within hours of the 9/11/01 attack on the twin towers, there were pretty solid reports that Bin Lauden was behind it. Except for the conspiracy theory nuts, these early reports proved true. At least with Bush, the story never changed.
" Ansar al- Sharia claims responsibility for Benghazi attack....embassy Tripoli reports the group claimed responsibility on Facebook and Twitter and has called for an attack on Embassy Tripoli."
THAT report has not been disputed. It has been verified by other intelligence agencies and agents who were watching live feeds of the attack and who were monitoring "chatter" from known terrorist groups.
Obama's "no acts of terror" speech made no direct reference to Benghazi, but even if you assume that is what he was talking about, WHY was the Obama team's video story the one that was promoted for weeks after the attack?
And why is it that the only ones pushing the video story were members of the WH team? Even the press was not touting that story (except perhaps MSNBC).
You supposed intelligent and open minded liberals here do not even question what is going on. You still buy Obama's video lie. I'm disappointed that you accept everything Obama says as true. Did you fact check the BS he put out during the last debate? Probably not.
Within hours of the 9/11/01 attack on the twin towers, there were pretty solid reports that Bin Lauden was behind it. Except for the conspiracy theory nuts, these early reports proved true. At least with Bush, the story never changed.