Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
8x10 versus 8x12 prints
#6
Oh, probably because the origins of photography were based on 8"x10" sheets of film, or glass plates, and they were cut down to 4 4"x5" sheets for smaller cameras. And prints were made by the contact print method.

The last few decades can't erase the 15 decades before them. I understand that almost all automated printers use roll paper that is 4", 5", 8", or 11" wide (rarely) so printing a print using one of those as a dimension is as simple as rotating the image, and cutting the print off to the correct length.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
8x10 versus 8x12 prints - by freeradical - 11-17-2012, 04:40 PM
Re: 8x10 versus 8x12 prints - by space-time - 11-17-2012, 06:50 PM
Re: 8x10 versus 8x12 prints - by ka jowct - 11-17-2012, 08:14 PM
Re: 8x10 versus 8x12 prints - by thermarest - 11-17-2012, 08:44 PM
Re: 8x10 versus 8x12 prints - by digby - 11-17-2012, 10:59 PM
Re: 8x10 versus 8x12 prints - by Racer X - 11-18-2012, 01:46 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)