03-28-2013, 01:47 AM
But if my interpretation of the graphic was correct, roughly half of Bush's murders were civilian with a fifth being children, while Obama's civilian deaths were down to about a quarter civilian with a tenth being children.
So statistically Obama's killed a lot more "bad guys" (non-children non-civilians) and fewer "innocents." In fact, he's only killed about as many innocents total as Bush killed bad guys, so his ratio's better by far. And that's some small consolation that per-hit, we're making fewer new enemies.
So statistically Obama's killed a lot more "bad guys" (non-children non-civilians) and fewer "innocents." In fact, he's only killed about as many innocents total as Bush killed bad guys, so his ratio's better by far. And that's some small consolation that per-hit, we're making fewer new enemies.