Sanford wins

[Mac-A-Matic]

RgrF wrote:
If your post was about gerrymandering in general, I'd have stayed out. it was an indictment of Democrats in your home state. Thought I'd balance the scales a bit.

So what you've "proven" is that republicans gerrymander in states such as Texas.

Unlike a number of the posters here, I don't work under the belief that one party is somehow "better" than the other. There was a condemnation by people here that somehow South Carolina (with it's majority republican) was somehow "bad" - I pointed out that in states such as Maryland, where a democrat majority exists, the corruption is at least the same.

Further, the implication about South Carolina's republican base was that it was (again) somehow "worse" than democrats when, in Maryland, democrats hold a dramatically larger percentage of the state's General Assembly. So, if South Carolina is "bad" because of its republican domination then Maryland must be "worse" because of its greater domination by democrats.

Of course, all of this is very inconvenient for blind liberals who want everyone to believe that only republicans are corrupt.