05-19-2013, 04:35 PM
As I suggested before and couldn't quite put my finger on... it seems like the larger cosmopolitan cities have relatively low hate speech measured while smaller regional population centers seem to be loci for individual modes of hate speech - some words pop up more than others; seeing now that this may be skewed by fewer than 100 unique users out of the millions of users, well, it makes sense completely.
In other words, individual hate words seem to blow up at random, most likely due to a local/regional influence accelerating the use of that word relative to the overall population and that is disproportionate to the population normalization.
Does that make sense?
In other words, individual hate words seem to blow up at random, most likely due to a local/regional influence accelerating the use of that word relative to the overall population and that is disproportionate to the population normalization.
Does that make sense?