Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bush paintings copied from wiki photos??
#16
DeusxMac wrote:
[quote=mattkime]
[quote=Ombligo]
[quote=mattkime]
eh, its a legit way of working.

No it is not - it is simply plagiarism. (bad plagiarism at that)
ug, nope, copying is legit in the art world for a variety of reasons. there are limits on it but they're far more liberal than most people would assume.

the general rule is - do you want to copy something? go ahead!
THIS

In amateur and student painting (and drawing) this is a centuries old practice. Even before photography students would set up their easels in museums and (attempt to) copy a masterwork.
You can encounter this practice in galleries and museums to this day.

The practice can teach a great deal about medium application and technique, proportion, and composition among other skills.
The interesting thing is not that he copied from a photo, which of course is common. It is WHAT photo he copied from. That is the interesting thing.
Sorry I caused so much confusion over something I simply found amusing.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Bush paintings copied from wiki photos?? - by Lemon Drop - 04-09-2014, 11:23 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)