08-26-2014, 11:57 AM
It seems to me that there would have to be an explanation which involves some kind of unfair trickery, don't you think?
No.
If somebody have a craps roll over four hours, I don't see why a well written, acted, and directed show can't win on merit.
I won't deny that somebody might have voted for it because it was going off the air. People can have biases for a show as well as against one.
But I don't see a high number of awards as evidence of any kind of collusion or skullduggery.
No.
If somebody have a craps roll over four hours, I don't see why a well written, acted, and directed show can't win on merit.
I won't deny that somebody might have voted for it because it was going off the air. People can have biases for a show as well as against one.
But I don't see a high number of awards as evidence of any kind of collusion or skullduggery.