11-04-2016, 09:46 PM
A detailed article about the supposed "email scandal". Of course, the people who should read this won't. Or maybe can't: it's long and uses big words.
"If you agree with her on policy, vote with a clear conscience about the server."
This is unfortunate because emailgate, like so many Clinton pseudo-scandals before it, is [BS]. The real scandal here is the way a story that was at best of modest significance came to dominate the US presidential election — overwhelming stories of much more importance, giving the American people a completely skewed impression of one of the two nominees, and creating space for the FBI to intervene in the election in favor of its apparently preferred candidate in a dangerous way.
http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2...mpaign=vox&utm_content=entry&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook
"If you agree with her on policy, vote with a clear conscience about the server."
This is unfortunate because emailgate, like so many Clinton pseudo-scandals before it, is [BS]. The real scandal here is the way a story that was at best of modest significance came to dominate the US presidential election — overwhelming stories of much more importance, giving the American people a completely skewed impression of one of the two nominees, and creating space for the FBI to intervene in the election in favor of its apparently preferred candidate in a dangerous way.
http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2...mpaign=vox&utm_content=entry&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook