11-04-2016, 09:18 PM
pdq wrote:
BTW, I went over to townhall.com, where they were maintaining that Baier's story had not been debunked, and posted an informative link to the WaPo piece about Faux News' recent retracto-matic.
I see now that my post/comment has been deleted.
These folks live in their own little fantasy world, and don't appreciate it when someone ties to inject reality.
You seem to be the one that lives in your own little fantasy world:
a) the factual part of the story is still correct "the investigations would continue after the election. And I answered that, yes, our sources said it would, they would continue"
b) the incorrect part is his conclusion, "they would continue to likely an indictment.", a speculation of a certainty that an indictment is forthcoming.
He stands by his story, ie part a, which is apparently quite factual.
And he admitted that part b was a mistake on his part.
In fact a more correct speculation, in view of the past behaviour of Obama DOJ, we can predict with high probability that Clinton will get a pass, under one excuse or another....
