09-25-2017, 12:28 AM
There you go again Stevie, back yo your hate filled stereotyping and typecasting.
On top of strawmen and your usual lack of reading comprehension....
Or is it simply, once again, you failed to comprehend my statement of understanding Moslems, living with them, working with them, being in business with them as partners, attending their weddings, their funerals, being claimed as a member of a Moslem family to point of being a stand for the groom's father, as indicative of what you see as hate, hon?
Or are you just projecting your own rabid xenophobia on anybody who shows you full of hot air?....
But I did address, it hon, quite proactively, too:
yet you decided to go with the 5 cent explanation for the feeble minded....
Unlike you and your ignorant reporters, Asians tend to look at things from a much longer perspective of time.
Burma's Moslem immigration problem did not occur today, but under the rule of your civilized people who knew what is better for the poor natives, the British colonial rulers you are trying so hard to imitate.
Back in the late 19th century, all done despite Burmese opposition. When the British got out, they left Burmese holding the bag. Now the natives are dealing with it the way they understand.
The present government, including the paradigm of Burmese democracy, Suu Kyi, is also on board to remedy their immigration problem by sending the Bengalis back. She may utter internationally necessary palliatives, but nobody is under illusion that she does not condone the policy.
Is somebody making money on this, I am sure that everybody involved, but Suu Kyi, is going to get their pockets filled. That is the way it works over there.
But the projects mentioned in your half baked article have very little to do with the ethnic cleansing going on in Burma today. It is quite asinine to imagine a pipeline displacing multitudes of people of one ethnic group only. We have hundreds and hundreds of these with a very minimal impact.
In fact Bill Clinton's taking apart Serbia, ripping out Kosovo, for recently (historically speaking) settled Moslem immigrants, breaking the system of inviolate borders of postwar states, was a lesson Burmese do not want to repeat, much more of a factor, much more relevant than some Chinese pipeline....
On top of strawmen and your usual lack of reading comprehension....
$tevie wrote:I am sure you can show us where I specifically declared my hate for Moslems, hon.
I know from AS how much you hate Muslim....
Or is it simply, once again, you failed to comprehend my statement of understanding Moslems, living with them, working with them, being in business with them as partners, attending their weddings, their funerals, being claimed as a member of a Moslem family to point of being a stand for the groom's father, as indicative of what you see as hate, hon?
Or are you just projecting your own rabid xenophobia on anybody who shows you full of hot air?....
$tevie wrote:
You haven't addressed the post I was referring to. You called it an immigration problem.
But I did address, it hon, quite proactively, too:
max wrote:is that comprehension problem of yours rearing its ugly head, again?...
In case you do want to understand much more than what the shallow mass media has covered of Burma ethnic problems, you can start a separate tread on that subject and I will be happy to give you an in depth explanation.....
yet you decided to go with the 5 cent explanation for the feeble minded....
$tevie wrote:in fact that idiotic article explains nothing, that oil pipelines has very little with Buddhist land grabbing of Moslem settled lands. The mining and most of the Chinese developments are not happening in the areas inhabited by the Moslems, but by other multitudes of ethnic groups, including Chinese. And majority of that is the northern states.
Here you go, max. Here's a much better explanation than your silly diatribe about what a whiz kid you are.
https://qz.com/1074906/rohingya-the-oil-...ee-crisis/
Unlike you and your ignorant reporters, Asians tend to look at things from a much longer perspective of time.
Burma's Moslem immigration problem did not occur today, but under the rule of your civilized people who knew what is better for the poor natives, the British colonial rulers you are trying so hard to imitate.
Back in the late 19th century, all done despite Burmese opposition. When the British got out, they left Burmese holding the bag. Now the natives are dealing with it the way they understand.
The present government, including the paradigm of Burmese democracy, Suu Kyi, is also on board to remedy their immigration problem by sending the Bengalis back. She may utter internationally necessary palliatives, but nobody is under illusion that she does not condone the policy.
Is somebody making money on this, I am sure that everybody involved, but Suu Kyi, is going to get their pockets filled. That is the way it works over there.
But the projects mentioned in your half baked article have very little to do with the ethnic cleansing going on in Burma today. It is quite asinine to imagine a pipeline displacing multitudes of people of one ethnic group only. We have hundreds and hundreds of these with a very minimal impact.
In fact Bill Clinton's taking apart Serbia, ripping out Kosovo, for recently (historically speaking) settled Moslem immigrants, breaking the system of inviolate borders of postwar states, was a lesson Burmese do not want to repeat, much more of a factor, much more relevant than some Chinese pipeline....