03-17-2018, 10:42 PM
deckeda wrote:
It's very weird that the only language used in that agreement regarding "EC, LLC" is regarding payment, but that the reasons to not go public with information (because it's confidential) is for the person's benefit who never signed it. You would think that would matter, yeah?
So ... why didn't her first attorney bring that situation up say, in Oct. 2016?
She was just trying to get paid what they kept telling her she would get. Just before the election was the time where she had the most leverage to force the issue, and she did. The expectation was that he would lose in Nov. and then nobody would care anymore and she would never get paid if she didn't force the issue before then.