Buyers were not told the land would flood..on purpose

[bfd]

DeusxMac wrote:
[quote=billb]

"We had no idea - we were not told," Soule said. "Why did they build a house here if they knew it was inside a flood pool? If we would have known, we would not have purchased this house."

Yes you would have.
You would have weighed the odds of a flood and flood damage against increased travel time to work / cost to live elsewhere and would have bought it just the same.
Just like the people who live on hillsides that crumble, beach houses that are subject to flooding and erosion, houses on a fault line and houses over limestone deposits prone to collapsing, or surrounded by tall pines that can fall in a nor'easter or huricane.
You would have taken the risk.
Because you gotta live somewhere.

What a load of whiney crap.

Whiney?
Like...

billb wrote:
I planned for retirement, but Bill Clinton's first term tax increases wiped me out.

http://forums.macresource.com/read.php?2...sg-1689640


miley-laughing001: