02-28-2020, 05:32 AM
Wow, hyper-expensive AND hyper-ugly.
Dear Lord, I just realized the model is a guy. Those things are supposed to be for guys?!? I can only assume Burberry is making an early bid for April Fool's Day. And what is going on with the model's legs? Now that the Labour Party is done with him, is Jeremy Corbin pursuing a career in modeling?
Actually, after seeing that pic I retract the question. Jeremy Corbin's legs look MUCH better than the model's.
Well, I've been saying it for a while now and these shorts are the proof: The fashion industry's design goal has gone from "I want you to find me attractive" to "I dare you to find me attractive".
Edited to add- Those shorts are sooooo ugly...
How ugly are they?
I only just realized that the model is committing the classic fashion faux pas of wearing socks with sandals as well. That confirms it- These shorts are an early April Fool's Day joke.
Dear Lord, I just realized the model is a guy. Those things are supposed to be for guys?!? I can only assume Burberry is making an early bid for April Fool's Day. And what is going on with the model's legs? Now that the Labour Party is done with him, is Jeremy Corbin pursuing a career in modeling?
Actually, after seeing that pic I retract the question. Jeremy Corbin's legs look MUCH better than the model's.
Well, I've been saying it for a while now and these shorts are the proof: The fashion industry's design goal has gone from "I want you to find me attractive" to "I dare you to find me attractive".
Edited to add- Those shorts are sooooo ugly...
How ugly are they?
I only just realized that the model is committing the classic fashion faux pas of wearing socks with sandals as well. That confirms it- These shorts are an early April Fool's Day joke.