Judge cites Barr’s ‘misleading’ statements in ordering review of Mueller report redactions

[Ted King]

rjmacs wrote:
What happens when Barr refuses to provide the documents, claiming that his decision is not reviewable by the courts?

I think what the courts should do in that case is use legal precedent in rulings to determine whether or not such a claim is legally valid. If the judges think that according to precedent that Barr's claim is valid then he doesn't have to provide the documents. If the judges rule that his claim is not legally valid then he should turn over the documents. Of course, Barr should be able to appeal all the way to SCOTUS but he still ought to be bound by whatever decision they render.

That's what I think should happen. What with the Country Club Clan Federalists infesting so much of the legal system, though, who knows what will actually happen.