03-07-2020, 10:42 PM
rjmacs wrote:
[quote=Ted King]
[quote=rjmacs]
Your use of the word "ought" bothers me most in your post, Ted.
I'm sorry, I'm not sure why it does. Is it because the "ought" ought to be an "is" but could very well not be?
It's not anything about you that bothers me. It's that empirically, Barr seems to take any interrogate any legal or ethical 'should' to see if it contains any 'must.' If not, he ignores it and does as he deems appropriate. That's a uniquely dangerous quality in an attorney general (or any law enforcement officer).
Oh, I got you. Yeah, I completely agree.