Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Here's a weekend rabbit hole for you: O.J was guilty, but not of the actual murders? (possibly NSFW)
#9
Dennis S wrote:
I always though the the gloves thing was bogus - If they don't fit, you must acquit. If he needed some gloves to hide the fingerprints, he would use whatever was handy, even if they were too small.

Dunno if they were too small. He was already wearing cotton gloves while trying to put skin-tight driving gloves on over them.

The prosecutors set themselves up for failure. They were focused on making good TV and securing book/movie rights rather than serving their oath and duty to the law and justice.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Here's a weekend rabbit hole for you: O.J was guilty, but not of the actual murders? (possibly NSFW) - by Sarcany - 08-22-2020, 10:07 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)