08-23-2020, 05:23 AM
Sarcany wrote:
[quote=pRICE cUBE]
[quote=Sarcany]
[quote=Dennis S]
I always though the the gloves thing was bogus - If they don't fit, you must acquit. If he needed some gloves to hide the fingerprints, he would use whatever was handy, even if they were too small.
Dunno if they were too small. He was already wearing cotton gloves while trying to put skin-tight driving gloves on over them.
The prosecutors set themselves up for failure. They were focused on making good TV and securing book/movie rights rather than serving their oath and duty to the law and justice.
Is it your assertion that OJ committed the murders and the investigators/prosecution botched it?
Not both.
Just that they botched it.
So did the cops who failed to secure and document the evidence thoroughly with clear chain-of-custody, leaving them open to convincing allegations of tampering.
I agree with the outcome of the civil trial, that it's more likely than not that he committed murder.
I haven't seen evidence that -- to my mind -- is compelling "beyond a reasonable doubt."
Ditto. The not guilty verdict in the criminal trial was based on botched police work and idiotic decisions by the prosecutors. The most ridiculous thing was trying to get him to put on gloves that had shrunk due to getting soaked then dried. It was patently obvious that they were ruined. Sadly, this all led to there being a very tiny, but finite, amount of reasonable doubt. IMHO the chance that he is not a murderer are about the same as the chance that bigfoot is real.