Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Here's a weekend rabbit hole for you: O.J was guilty, but not of the actual murders? (possibly NSFW)
#22
Is it your assertion that OJ committed the murders and the investigators/prosecution botched it?


I believe that's exactly what happened.

He got away with murder.

I don't believe it was first degree murder, but second degree.

Intent is almost always impossible to prove.

Either the suspect/defendant demonstrates it clearly or the prosecution shows sufficient circumstances that allows a jury to believe it reasonable that he/she committed the crime.

The prosecution couldn't pull it off.

As for Fuhrman, he should have just said 'Yeah, I said it. So what.'

Ito make the trial a circus.

And just a split second after the jury announced the verdict, OJ turned to Goldman and gave him a sneer that was the final bit of confirmation for me.

No, I don't think he planned to kill anybody that night, but there's no doubt in my mind that he did.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Here's a weekend rabbit hole for you: O.J was guilty, but not of the actual murders? (possibly NSFW) - by RAMd®d - 08-23-2020, 08:51 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)