Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Hoo boy. SCOTUS splits 6-3 to allow Arizona voting restrictions
#15
Alito, writing for the majority:

“The mere fact that there is some disparity in impact does not necessarily mean that a system is not equally open or that it does not give everyone an equal opportunity to vote.”

I’ve read this a number of times, and I still can’t understand it. A law that disproportionately disenfranchises a group of voters (under the pretense of “solving” a non-existent problem) doesn’t affect their voting rights?

:S

PS - for just one example, isn’t Alito’s statement equally true of a poll tax?
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Hoo boy. SCOTUS splits 6-3 to allow Arizona voting restrictions - by pdq - 07-02-2021, 01:22 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)