05-07-2023, 09:53 PM
I regularly see people who tie these issues together.
I am just clueless.
1) Anti-abortion SHOULD be 'pro-life'. But guns are anything but.
2) More guns = more gun violence and more deaths. The science of association is really clear. So more guns is not 'pro life'. See (1) above.
3) Climate change denialists. I have no clue how this issue is tied in any way to points (1) and (2).
The only thing I can think of is that each is tied to some sort of societal change. But even that is not a full explanation. Anti-science? Not sure there is any real scientific debate over the science excess trying to define when human life starts? That isn't a scientific issue as biology is a circle.
I do not see the theme or have a clue how these are wrapped together. As someone who thinks of each separately, even the connection seems odd to me.
I am just clueless.
1) Anti-abortion SHOULD be 'pro-life'. But guns are anything but.
2) More guns = more gun violence and more deaths. The science of association is really clear. So more guns is not 'pro life'. See (1) above.
3) Climate change denialists. I have no clue how this issue is tied in any way to points (1) and (2).
The only thing I can think of is that each is tied to some sort of societal change. But even that is not a full explanation. Anti-science? Not sure there is any real scientific debate over the science excess trying to define when human life starts? That isn't a scientific issue as biology is a circle.
I do not see the theme or have a clue how these are wrapped together. As someone who thinks of each separately, even the connection seems odd to me.