Answer me this

[PeterB]

RgrF wrote:
[quote=PeterB]
[quote=cbelt3]
Because the FBI and DOJ are being very very very careful. That's how they roll... they make their cases one piece of paper at a time. So there is no chance of any loophole.

This is the only answer that makes ANY sense to me. If this guy were anyone other than who he is (or more precisely, who he USED to be), he would have been long since prosecuted and locked up by now.
That and the fact he persuaded over 70 million people to vote for him, people wont want to think they were fooled and don't easily admit to that level of mistake.

As others have pointed out, they need an ironclad case, one that can be sold to the public before they indict. This close to election any move they make is fraught with danger.
I feel like that's exactly the point, folks need to have the information presented to them before the next election, in order to make informed decisions about whom they vote for. Whether they choose to pay heed or dismiss the information, at least they can't claim that they didn't know about it. The prosecutors shouldn't have to convince the public of anything though: a crime is a crime, and as Garland has said, nobody is above the law. And yes, it's close to an election, but not the Presidential election, and one can make an argument that you'll always be close to some election.

As for the 70 million, SOME of them (a definite "some") have recognized their mistake since, but yes, it is human nature not to want to own up to one's errors or admit that they were taken. That is going to take a fair bit of time... it's worth remembering that this is nothing new:

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/...de-215274/
https://millercenter.org/the-presidency/...y-theories

Edit: and on the subject of the 70 million, time to take a little trip down memory lane:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxHp8Hughd0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gSGF71zONbY