05-05-2023, 07:55 PM
How could you possibly compell a criminal to get firearms liability insurance that would never cover an illegal act anyway. I'm scratching my head over that one. I understand your general thinking, but insurance companies have never covered willful illegal acts, to the best of my knowledge. Malpractice insurance, for example, covers accidents, but not willful acts. People don't accidentally become mass shooters, or accidentally go on a violent robbery spree.
Never have I ever said I, or the Supreme Court, was against background checks. If I even alluded to that, I certainly didn't intend to. My mistake. Safe storage acts might be iffy from a legal standpoint, but I use a gun safe just because it is the right thing to do for my community.
The 3 or 4 lawsuits in California, and the at least one in Illinois, the 2+ in Washington, and at least one in Oregon, and one or two in Texas and Louisianna, all likely have components in the individual legislation that will survive. That's pretty common. If one contains 6 components of "gun control" for example, the magazine capacity ban and the firearms characteristics ban shouldn't survive. But safe storage and background checks likely would, and waiting period might survive. Not every component violates federal law or the Constitution, as they stand today.
Never have I ever said I, or the Supreme Court, was against background checks. If I even alluded to that, I certainly didn't intend to. My mistake. Safe storage acts might be iffy from a legal standpoint, but I use a gun safe just because it is the right thing to do for my community.
The 3 or 4 lawsuits in California, and the at least one in Illinois, the 2+ in Washington, and at least one in Oregon, and one or two in Texas and Louisianna, all likely have components in the individual legislation that will survive. That's pretty common. If one contains 6 components of "gun control" for example, the magazine capacity ban and the firearms characteristics ban shouldn't survive. But safe storage and background checks likely would, and waiting period might survive. Not every component violates federal law or the Constitution, as they stand today.