05-09-2023, 07:55 PM
jonny wrote:
"Carroll had proven Mr. Trump sexually abused her, but they rejected the accusation that she had been raped."
So stupid.
I think I read that she has the dress she wore with "stains" on it that could have been used to compare with Trump's DNA but since the judge in this case could not compel Trump to provide a DNA sample that it could not be used at this trial. Someone suggested - maybe here? - that Carroll could get a DNA from Trump's sister and get enough of a match to have a high degree of confidence that the "stain" was from Trump. Maybe now that the trial is over she could pursue that without making it a legal issue - just a "just thought you might like to know the likelihood" issue.