08-03-2023, 04:43 PM
pdq wrote:
[quote=Mr645]
The point is they didn't kill, beat or rape the woman thanks to her having a gun to protect herself.
Well, they tried to kill her by firing back, obviously, but missed.
Seems just as likely (if not moreso) that the alternate outcome had she not lobbed off a shot was that they would have taken the stuff and left. In other words, same outcome, only with far less risk to her life, and less damage to her property.
I think you gunners live in a fantasy world.
Or they deliberately missed, but fired just to keep her from getting a good shot off. No pictures of the bullet holes left behind currently available to compare with where she was located.
Lots of assumptions being posted, little fact. The reality is the self defense use of a firearm that can be confirmed as being necessary and appropriate may happen a few time a week across the entire country. Gunners latch onto every use whether necessary or not and use them as examples to support their case. But the exception does not make the rule.