03-28-2024, 08:27 PM
Yup, that’s pretty boneheaded.
I see what you did there.
a woman has to obtain a male guardian’s permission to marry
a wife has to obey her husband in a “reasonable manner”
her husband’s financial support is dependent on the wife’s “obedience”.
Refusal to have sex with her husband, live in the marital home or travel with him without a “legitimate excuse” can also justify the withdrawal of financial support under the law.
a forthcoming new penal code “fails to protect women and girls from all forms of gender-based violence”.
MAGAts must be like 'Wait... What?!'
Yes, Saudi, my first pick to lead a women's rights forum.
Saudi Arabia, where a woman can be jailed for wearing a flimsy burnoose.
At least they don't have honor killings.
They don't, right?
At least none of that could ever happen in the good ol' US of A.
Ok, it did, but we've moved forward, progressed, evolved.
I absolutely want to go back to the America where women couldn’t vote.
Ok, maybe not so much.
I see what you did there.
a woman has to obtain a male guardian’s permission to marry
a wife has to obey her husband in a “reasonable manner”
her husband’s financial support is dependent on the wife’s “obedience”.
Refusal to have sex with her husband, live in the marital home or travel with him without a “legitimate excuse” can also justify the withdrawal of financial support under the law.
a forthcoming new penal code “fails to protect women and girls from all forms of gender-based violence”.
MAGAts must be like 'Wait... What?!'
Yes, Saudi, my first pick to lead a women's rights forum.
Saudi Arabia, where a woman can be jailed for wearing a flimsy burnoose.
At least they don't have honor killings.
They don't, right?
At least none of that could ever happen in the good ol' US of A.
Ok, it did, but we've moved forward, progressed, evolved.
I absolutely want to go back to the America where women couldn’t vote.
Ok, maybe not so much.