MacResource › My Category › Tips and Deals v
"Lost" via iTms

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Linear Mode
"Lost" via iTms
Jimmypoo Offline
Unregistered
Posts: 16,592
Threads: 1,240
Joined: Mar 2013
#12
02-10-2006, 12:33 AM
Altivec enhanced is up to 7x faster than same MHz G3.

128 bit wide, so no waiting.

That is a massive difference vs 64 bit material being broken in half. Although I've not tried any video of substance on my G4/450 (it's unplugged) since they started offering iTMS stuff, if it is like MPEG, I don't have any trouble playing all but the largest windows of it.

A Cube 450 should still be up to 2x faster than the 900MHz G3.

Overall MacBench showed a 450 to 900MHz (G4's) jump was a 40% improvement in base score. I would think that HD speed would not be a major issue here.
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
"Lost" via iTms - by h' - 02-09-2006, 07:25 PM
Re: "Lost" via iTms - by jimbrady - 02-09-2006, 07:32 PM
Re: "Lost" via iTms - by jimbrady - 02-09-2006, 07:32 PM
Re: "Lost" via iTms - by JJ - 02-09-2006, 07:34 PM
Re: "Lost" via iTms - by Paul F. - 02-09-2006, 07:35 PM
Re: "Lost" via iTms - by 3d - 02-09-2006, 08:03 PM
Re: "Lost" via iTms - by jimbrady - 02-09-2006, 08:07 PM
Re: "Lost" via iTms - by NewtonMP2100 - 02-09-2006, 08:12 PM
Re: "Lost" via iTms - by BigGuynRusty - 02-09-2006, 08:30 PM
Re: "Lost" via iTms - by h' - 02-09-2006, 10:48 PM
Re: "Lost" via iTms - by JJ - 02-09-2006, 11:02 PM
Re: "Lost" via iTms - by Jimmypoo - 02-10-2006, 12:33 AM
Re: "Lost" via iTms - by TheToddler - 02-10-2006, 01:21 AM
Re: "Lost" via iTms - by h' - 02-10-2006, 01:37 AM
Re: "Lost" via iTms - by h' - 02-10-2006, 01:51 AM
Re: "Lost" via iTms - by h' - 02-10-2006, 01:52 AM
Re: "Lost" via iTms - by PeterB - 02-10-2006, 05:27 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)