10-08-2006, 09:39 PM
you know, herbiesyufy, I've been munching on your position, and it suddenly became crystal clear:
you think that if a customer is not given explicit permission to do something, then by definition the customer is forbidden from doing it.
Since Starbucks never said explicitly, "Please use our condiment bar to create your own drinks in whatever fashion you choose," it was your stand that customers were forbidden from creating their own drinks in whatever fashion they chose.
Man. Do you wait for explicit permission for everything?
But now, of course, Starbucks has given explicit permission, so it's a moot point--and yet, you stand firm and insist that somehow, Starbucks is wrong.
Starbucks is wrong. Hmmmm.........
you think that if a customer is not given explicit permission to do something, then by definition the customer is forbidden from doing it.
Since Starbucks never said explicitly, "Please use our condiment bar to create your own drinks in whatever fashion you choose," it was your stand that customers were forbidden from creating their own drinks in whatever fashion they chose.
Man. Do you wait for explicit permission for everything?
But now, of course, Starbucks has given explicit permission, so it's a moot point--and yet, you stand firm and insist that somehow, Starbucks is wrong.
Starbucks is wrong. Hmmmm.........