05-27-2007, 08:14 AM
> Odd that you would think you know better than I, what I've read.
If you have read anything at all in those fields, you have yet to demonstrate an understanding of it. Perhaps you skim?
> Now tell me where I said I wanted people to deal in undebatable facts
Once again, you have premised your statements upon something you imagined that I wrote. I did not say that you wanted that.
It's odd that you depend so much upon an imaginary discussion when the text is right here in front of you.
> we were discussing whether I know anything about science, if you look back.
Actually, we weren't discussing that. You keep trying to derail the discussion into the outpourings of your persecution complex, but our topic is not you and the scope of your ego.
This thread is about the rules for getting into heaven, starting with the Catholic Church's decision that unbaptized babies might now get into heaven. There's a lot of room to roam under this subject, but you've taken it too far. You may enjoy that you've changed the direction of the conversation, but it's bad netiquette to hijack a thread to stroke yourself in public.
If you'd like to go on talking about what you imagine people are saying about you and your particular view of "science" then you should start a new topic for that.
> I think if you want people to be nice, you might get better results if you were nice yourself. kj.
I'll be nice to you right now:
This thread has moved far from the original topic. I don't think that kj is taking the discussion in a productive direction.
I won't respond to further posts in this thread unless they relate to the original topic. I suggest that everyone else do the same.
If you have read anything at all in those fields, you have yet to demonstrate an understanding of it. Perhaps you skim?
> Now tell me where I said I wanted people to deal in undebatable facts
Once again, you have premised your statements upon something you imagined that I wrote. I did not say that you wanted that.
It's odd that you depend so much upon an imaginary discussion when the text is right here in front of you.
> we were discussing whether I know anything about science, if you look back.
Actually, we weren't discussing that. You keep trying to derail the discussion into the outpourings of your persecution complex, but our topic is not you and the scope of your ego.
This thread is about the rules for getting into heaven, starting with the Catholic Church's decision that unbaptized babies might now get into heaven. There's a lot of room to roam under this subject, but you've taken it too far. You may enjoy that you've changed the direction of the conversation, but it's bad netiquette to hijack a thread to stroke yourself in public.
If you'd like to go on talking about what you imagine people are saying about you and your particular view of "science" then you should start a new topic for that.
> I think if you want people to be nice, you might get better results if you were nice yourself. kj.
I'll be nice to you right now:
This thread has moved far from the original topic. I don't think that kj is taking the discussion in a productive direction.
I won't respond to further posts in this thread unless they relate to the original topic. I suggest that everyone else do the same.