05-28-2007, 01:38 AM
>>If you have read anything at all in those fields, you have yet to demonstrate an understanding of it. Perhaps you skim?
I guess I'm just supposed to take your word for it, then?
>>Once again, you have premised your statements upon something you imagined that I wrote. I did not say that you wanted that.
It was implied. If it wasn't, your reply made no sense at all.
>>>Actually, we weren't discussing that. You keep trying to derail the discussion into the outpourings of your persecution complex, but our topic is not you and the scope of your ego.
Actually, we were, unless you are going to lie. I am not being persecuted, and no one else I know (at least in the U.S.) is. I started out discussing the topic in a very reasonable manner, as was everyone until you started making threats and insulting people.
>>>This thread is about the rules for getting into heaven, starting with the Catholic Church's decision that unbaptized babies might now get into heaven. There's a lot of room to roam under this subject, but you've taken it too far. You may enjoy that you've changed the direction of the conversation, but it's bad netiquette to hijack a thread to stroke yourself in public.
Hey, it takes two to tango, to coin a phrase. If you could concede even the smallest point, ever, there wouldn't be such an issue. As long as you refuse to take responsibility for threats and insults, your going to continue to point it out.
>>If you'd like to go on talking about what you imagine people are saying about you and your particular view of "science" then you should start a new topic for that.
Now you're going to maintain you didn't say that? Do you really think people are that stupid? Do you think I'm going to let you insult me and say nothing to rebuke you? A lot of the time, I might, but not this time. kj.
I guess I'm just supposed to take your word for it, then?
>>Once again, you have premised your statements upon something you imagined that I wrote. I did not say that you wanted that.
It was implied. If it wasn't, your reply made no sense at all.
>>>Actually, we weren't discussing that. You keep trying to derail the discussion into the outpourings of your persecution complex, but our topic is not you and the scope of your ego.
Actually, we were, unless you are going to lie. I am not being persecuted, and no one else I know (at least in the U.S.) is. I started out discussing the topic in a very reasonable manner, as was everyone until you started making threats and insulting people.
>>>This thread is about the rules for getting into heaven, starting with the Catholic Church's decision that unbaptized babies might now get into heaven. There's a lot of room to roam under this subject, but you've taken it too far. You may enjoy that you've changed the direction of the conversation, but it's bad netiquette to hijack a thread to stroke yourself in public.
Hey, it takes two to tango, to coin a phrase. If you could concede even the smallest point, ever, there wouldn't be such an issue. As long as you refuse to take responsibility for threats and insults, your going to continue to point it out.
>>If you'd like to go on talking about what you imagine people are saying about you and your particular view of "science" then you should start a new topic for that.
Now you're going to maintain you didn't say that? Do you really think people are that stupid? Do you think I'm going to let you insult me and say nothing to rebuke you? A lot of the time, I might, but not this time. kj.