Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Milk is more dangerous than second hand smoke
#8
My wife and her dad ran a dairy until a few years back. Their cows didn't get growth hormones,
steroids or any of that crap. If a cow got sick and required antibiotics those cows were kept
back until last in the milking order and their milk was dumped for I believe 7 days after the
antibiotic treatment stopped. Every tank of milk that was picked up was tested for a
multitude of things, at the farmers expense. If anything like an antibiotic or bacteria count
was too high the farmer that allowed that milk to get into the tanker truck had to pay for the
entire tanker load of milk, at that time that amounted to $6-8K.

Speaking of milk, a newspaper article:

Got milk? Drive 128 miles for it?

http://www.charlotte.com/breaking_news/s...86729.html

BTW: Baby Tats ;-)
[Image: 1Tr0bSl.jpeg]
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Milk is more dangerous than second hand smoke - by Grateful11 - 07-08-2007, 11:12 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)