Tiger attack. . .San Francisco Zoo admits that the wall was too low. . .

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Linear Mode

Tiger attack. . .San Francisco Zoo admits that the wall was too low. . .

Don Kiyoti Offline

Offline

Posting Freak

Posts: 3,777
Threads: 299
Joined: Dec 2010
Reputation: 0

#13

12-28-2007, 02:51 AM

[quote space-time][quote Comandanta_Blankenship]Too bad they had to kill the tiger. Should have awarded her a medal.
are you serious? a medal for what?

I am all for animal rights, but when it becomes a matter of human vs animal, guess what, I protect those from my own species. Unless I am a tiger typing here on this powerbook, that means the human lives and the cat dies. Period.
At this point, given that the Siberian tigers are nearly extinct, I believe it's reasonable to place a greater value on the life of the tiger than that of certain humans.

Of course that proposition can generally only be demonstrated after the fact: e.g., the life of a poacher vs. the life of the mountain gorilla he just killed. And in this case, if the tiger was taunted by any of the human victims, the human had it coming. That is based on speculation

Find

Reply

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

Tiger attack. . .San Francisco Zoo admits that the wall was too low. . . - by NewtonMP2100 - 12-28-2007, 12:02 AM

Re: Tiger attack. . .San Francisco Zoo admits that the wall was too low. . . - by volcs0 - 12-28-2007, 12:22 AM

Re: Tiger attack. . .San Francisco Zoo admits that the wall was too low. . . - by M A V I C - 12-28-2007, 12:41 AM

Re: Tiger attack. . .San Francisco Zoo admits that the wall was too low. . . - by AlphaDog - 12-28-2007, 12:49 AM

Re: Tiger attack. . .San Francisco Zoo admits that the wall was too low. . . - by JoeH - 12-28-2007, 12:56 AM

Re: Tiger attack. . .San Francisco Zoo admits that the wall was too low. . . - by vicrock - 12-28-2007, 12:56 AM

Re: Tiger attack. . .San Francisco Zoo admits that the wall was too low. . . - by M A V I C - 12-28-2007, 12:58 AM

Re: Tiger attack. . .San Francisco Zoo admits that the wall was too low. . . - by billb - 12-28-2007, 01:16 AM

She was provoked and a gorgeous animal died because of these idiots..... - by Comandanta_Blankenship - 12-28-2007, 01:49 AM

Re: She was provoked and a gorgeous animal died because of these idiots..... - by space-time - 12-28-2007, 02:35 AM

Re: She was provoked and a gorgeous animal died because of these idiots..... - by vision63 - 12-28-2007, 02:44 AM

Re: She was provoked and a gorgeous animal died because of these idiots..... - by M A V I C - 12-28-2007, 02:51 AM

Re: She was provoked and a gorgeous animal died because of these idiots..... - by Don Kiyoti - 12-28-2007, 02:51 AM

Re: Tiger attack. . .San Francisco Zoo admits that the wall was too low. . . - by ssledoux - 12-28-2007, 02:52 AM

Re: Tiger attack. . .San Francisco Zoo admits that the wall was too low. . . - by M A V I C - 12-28-2007, 02:57 AM

Re: Tiger attack. . .San Francisco Zoo admits that the wall was too low. . . - by MacMagus - 12-28-2007, 03:00 AM

Re: Tiger attack. . .San Francisco Zoo admits that the wall was too low. . . - by space-time - 12-28-2007, 03:13 AM

All I need to know I learned from Disneyland - by enrico7300 - 12-28-2007, 03:17 AM

I guess we need to bring all of our Soldiers home from Iraq to guard the Zoos from rampaging Tigers... - by Tiogapass - 12-28-2007, 03:18 AM

Re: Tiger attack. . .San Francisco Zoo admits that the wall was too low. . . - by h' - 12-28-2007, 03:41 AM

Note to young adults: Don't tease the big pussy cats. - by Comandanta_Blankenship - 12-28-2007, 04:16 AM

Re: She was provoked and a gorgeous animal died because of these idiots..... - by comaplate - 12-28-2007, 04:26 AM

Re: She was provoked and a gorgeous animal died because of these idiots..... - by Anonymous User - 12-28-2007, 05:44 AM

Re: Tiger attack. . .San Francisco Zoo admits that the wall was too low. . . - by ssledoux - 12-28-2007, 06:02 AM

Re: Tiger attack. . .San Francisco Zoo admits that the wall was too low. . . - by bfd - 12-28-2007, 06:21 AM

Re: Tiger attack. . .San Francisco Zoo admits that the wall was too low. . . - by h' - 12-28-2007, 01:50 PM

Re: Tiger attack. . .San Francisco Zoo admits that the wall was too low. . . - by RAMd®d - 12-28-2007, 04:05 PM

Re: Tiger attack. . .San Francisco Zoo admits that the wall was too low. . . - by h' - 12-28-2007, 04:30 PM

Re: Tiger attack. . .San Francisco Zoo admits that the wall was too low. . . - by brofoski - 12-28-2007, 05:28 PM

Re: Tiger attack. . .San Francisco Zoo admits that the wall was too low. . . - by h' - 12-28-2007, 08:16 PM

Re: Tiger attack. . .San Francisco Zoo admits that the wall was too low. . . - by mnafe - 12-28-2007, 11:46 PM

Re: Tiger attack. . .San Francisco Zoo admits that the wall was too low. . . - by mnafe - 12-28-2007, 11:50 PM

Re: Tiger attack. . .San Francisco Zoo admits that the wall was too low. . . - by norse - 12-29-2007, 03:50 AM

Re: Tiger attack. . .San Francisco Zoo admits that the wall was too low. . . - by SteveO - 12-29-2007, 10:36 PM

Re: Tiger attack. . .San Francisco Zoo admits that the wall was too low. . . - by MacMagus - 12-30-2007, 01:30 AM

Interesting that no tiger got out of this habitat in the 67 years of it's existance. - by norteamericano - 12-31-2007, 04:02 AM

Re: Tiger attack. . .San Francisco Zoo admits that the wall was too low. . . - by h' - 12-31-2007, 05:17 AM

It's totally weird what happened, these friscoites just dont ever expect anything bad to happen to them - after all, the - by liberals' liberal - 12-31-2007, 03:35 PM

Re: It's totally weird what happened, these friscoites just dont ever expect anything bad to happen to them - after all, - by norse - 12-31-2007, 06:18 PM

Re: Interesting that no tiger got out of this habitat in the 67 years of it's existance. - by kap - 01-04-2008, 03:35 AM

View a Printable Version

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)