12-31-2007, 06:17 AM
Assuming the hurtful opinion contains untruths, i.e. would create a situation of libel/slander;
why should it be potentially punishable when it's not anonymous--a potential punishment you clearly condone above, when you say:
but then why do you seem to be saying that it's OK for it not to be punishable if protected by anonymity?
why should it be potentially punishable when it's not anonymous--a potential punishment you clearly condone above, when you say:
There are rare circumstances where speech might be used to incite inappropriate violence where I would tentatively be in favor of criminal punishment.
There are circumstances where I'd agree that if a person knowingly lied in a public forum then that person should be held accountable for real damages in civil court.
but then why do you seem to be saying that it's OK for it not to be punishable if protected by anonymity?