09-26-2008, 01:59 AM
I wonder what the opposite of that statement would be?
"We can have a democracy, or we can have a state that seizes private assets and redistributes wealth, but we can't have both"
What would that be called? That's not democracy either. There's got to be something other than those two choices...
:patriot:
"We can have a democracy, or we can have a state that seizes private assets and redistributes wealth, but we can't have both"
What would that be called? That's not democracy either. There's got to be something other than those two choices...
:patriot: