Palin is campaigning for what?

[karsen]

Gutenberg wrote:
I don't understand, sorry. How would a quote confirm the story? I would think his own observation, not to mention the photographs and video, would be plenty.

Just because the guy's a reporter doesn't automatically mean he's a liar.

I didn't say he was a liar. But in his story he gives no evidence, other than his word.

He said the campaign only handed out 2 types of signs, you'd think he'd have someone from the campaign verify that because he really has no way of knowing. Aren't good reporters supposed to try and get validation?

If it is true that signs with "McCain" on them weren't handed out (and it does appear that way) that's pretty amazing. Maybe it was more of a Putnam rally, I don't know. Weird.