12-31-2008, 09:02 PM
So IF the item were insured they MAY have paid the claim.
I don't think that's correct. In this case there is proof of delivery which trumps the "lost in the mail" card. If the package *had* been insured, delivery documented, and the buyer claimed he/she didn't receive it, they would still be in the same quandary.
***
you're wrong on this - I've been there and investigated this before - insurance is completely different and includes an internal tracking system (for USPS use only) - it's NOT the same situation at all...
I don't think that's correct. In this case there is proof of delivery which trumps the "lost in the mail" card. If the package *had* been insured, delivery documented, and the buyer claimed he/she didn't receive it, they would still be in the same quandary.
***
you're wrong on this - I've been there and investigated this before - insurance is completely different and includes an internal tracking system (for USPS use only) - it's NOT the same situation at all...