08-24-2010, 09:41 PM
LIFE on Windows 3.1!!
If you were the judge in this case, how would you rule?
|
08-24-2010, 09:41 PM
LIFE on Windows 3.1!!
08-24-2010, 10:14 PM
Is the driver a celebrity? Then I think they should only be subjected to house arrest for, I dunno, 3 months. Sound good?
08-24-2010, 10:37 PM
Not answering the judge question.
But advise to learn that regardless the legal penalty, the driver is alive. Choose your mode of transportation knowing this.
08-24-2010, 10:53 PM
Paul F. wrote: Shouldn't be a jury as the driver plead guilty. That being said, I agree that a hard 20 with no parole, add in loss of driving privilege for life with immediate imprisionment if this person ever operates a motor vehicle within their lifetime. It is obvious that this person has no regard for the law and is now a three time offender (even if they aren't felony offenses). No leniency should be shown.
08-24-2010, 11:33 PM
threeprong, you're in NC right?
I read about this case & the presiding judge is reportedly a pantywaist showing a particular favoritism for female defendants. sad
08-24-2010, 11:33 PM
This person is a danger to society and should receive the maximum sentence for manslaughter and all the other charges (leaving the scene of an accident, marked lanes violation, etc. etc.).
On the other hand, bike riders should always wear helmets. I'm assuming the biker wasn't wearing one or else his/her hair wouldn't have been in the windshield of the car. I'm a biker and always wear a helmet. It saved my life once, even though it didn't help my broken elbow much.
08-25-2010, 01:52 AM
dreed-
Agreed, however helmet don't always help when it's a 3 ton vehicle traveling at 35 mph (or higher) versus a human body. My Dad was killed when he was struck by a minivan going about 35. (Not the driver's fault... Dad walked against the light. At night. In the rain. Wearing dark clothes. He was just.. in a hurry.)
08-25-2010, 02:05 AM
A lot of question marks…
threeprong wrote: If the felony hit and run sticks, I'd have a hard time believing they won't serve some jail time with the surrounding facts and the history already on the record. How long do the "deserve"? Way too many facts missing to answer that one. But if it's not already a given, it's obviously way, way past time to pull their driving privileges permanently no matter what else happens.
08-25-2010, 02:30 AM
cbelt3 wrote: Yeah, my uncle was killed while crossing the road by an SUV and the driver wasn't charged with anything. The newspaper reported that my uncle was "carrying a bottle of wine", which he hadn't even had the opportunity to open before he was run over and killed by the SUV that hit him, even though he was wearing a brightly colored plaid shirt and the street was well lit, but the driver wasn't at fault. Sorry about your dad, cbelt3. That just sucks.
08-25-2010, 03:43 AM
I asked the question above because I wanted to check the pulse here on how folks felt about this scenario.
The details I put in the earlier post were from a real case that just went to trial and sentencing. The driver was sentenced to 14-17 months in prison. Sentence delayed until Oct. 11 There's talk locally of this ruling being light due to the perception of bicycles on the road. Similar cases involving either pedestrians or other vehicles with a hit and run death have warranted much longer sentences. Details of the real case here... http://www.digtriad.com/news/local/story...yid=147015&catid=57 Thanks for sharing your responses. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|