04-14-2015, 10:46 PM
Nice that his company is making enough money to afford it, but I would wager that most places couldn't do it and remain profitable.
There are two main things working against this. One is total workforce size. The fewer people you employ the easier it is give everyone a raise. If you take Walmart for example. The CEO makes $35 million a year. There are 2.2 million employees. So every employee would get about an extra $20 in their paycheck per YEAR if they implemented the same policy. Even if you invested every penny Walmart made($16 Billion) and gave it to every worker that would only increase their wages by $750 a year.
The other is profit margins. He is now going to run the risk that someone will under cut him in the market. His cost of doing business is artificially high and it would be very easy for a competitor to swoop in and charge less.
There are two main things working against this. One is total workforce size. The fewer people you employ the easier it is give everyone a raise. If you take Walmart for example. The CEO makes $35 million a year. There are 2.2 million employees. So every employee would get about an extra $20 in their paycheck per YEAR if they implemented the same policy. Even if you invested every penny Walmart made($16 Billion) and gave it to every worker that would only increase their wages by $750 a year.
The other is profit margins. He is now going to run the risk that someone will under cut him in the market. His cost of doing business is artificially high and it would be very easy for a competitor to swoop in and charge less.