Posts: 46,542
Threads: 2,629
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
0
The reasoning seems to be that helping the individual homeowners will ultimately help the financial institutions. So tax money is still bailing out these institutions, it's just disguised as a warm-and-fuzzy.
I dislike the way people insist on injecting morality into these equations. "Bad companies deserve to die" and "Bad homeowners deserve to be foreclosed upon" and other such malarkey. Capitalism is not a moral belief system and it's really stupid to suddenly try to act like it is.
Posts: 7,301
Threads: 463
Joined: Jan 2022
Reputation:
0
When responsible borrowers are punished for the misdeeds of irresponsible ones, moral outrage is not unwarranted. Replace "bad company" or "bad homeowner" with "bad decision". Bad companies who make bad decisions do deserve to die, or be penalized. Just as good decisions should be rewarded. Bad homeowners (borrowers with risky credit) deserve to be foreclosed upon. Not as moral punishment, but as a natural consequence of the terms of the contract they voluntarily accepted responsibility for. Asking responsible (good) borrowers to buy irresponsible (bad) borrowers a house? This will understandably be viewed as a morally offensive, as well as economically offensive idea. But no worse than asking taxpayers to reward the bad decisions of failing financial institutions.
Posts: 46,542
Threads: 2,629
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
0
You would rather have the economy go down the crapper than risk "helping" someone who was "bad". I can't buy into that.
Posts: 50,838
Threads: 670
Joined: Mar 2024
think they'd pay for an illlegal alien to do my windows ?
Posts: 7,301
Threads: 463
Joined: Jan 2022
Reputation:
0
If we want to voluntarily risk "helping" someone who's bad, or suffered a misfortune, or even help someone who willfully did something stupid or reckless, no one is stopping us. As a society, we do it all the time. Generously.
Having our future earnings seized, fed through a bureaucracy, and distributed to bad or unfortunate people, to paper over these failures, that's a different story.
You don't have to buy into it. You won't have a choice. The rest of us will take money out of your pocket to pay for it whether you agree or not.
Posts: 46,542
Threads: 2,629
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
0
Wait, they are not going to give the money to the homeowners. So the question is moot.
Posts: 7,301
Threads: 463
Joined: Jan 2022
Reputation:
0
Oh, now it's moot. Whether we bail out borrowers or lenders is moot, we're taking your money either way.
You'd think a house full of crazy people would be depressing. It's actually really fun.