Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Ugh, had my car stolen: Final Epilogue
#11
That's a travesty of justice, ho'. How is that sentence even possible?
Reply
#12
The jail sentence and debt are and should be two separate issues.

You don't buy your way out of jail because you can reimburse your victim.

Sentences tend to be a little to[o] short, and I'm not a fan of time off. And this guy already had some trouble in another state?

No, justice was not served on either count.
Reply
#13
Sue him in civil court.
Reply
#14
N-OS X-tasy! wrote:
That's a travesty of justice, ho'. How is that sentence even possible?

The prosecution sucked. The judge was a nutcase.
But in the end the lack of absolute physical proof that the cyclist proceeded on a green light, despite two very strong eyewitness testimonies, got the killer off.
Reply
#15
It depends. If you're in a one-party state and you are one of the parties then your not required to notify the other party:

http://www.rcfp.org/taping/states.html
Reply
#16
The state of AZ has a judgment on him from my understanding but there's nothing to stop him from leaving the state (like he did in NH) once out. I suppose I could file a suit against him but where he lives after his prison sentence is anyone's guess.

I can only hope for Karma to catch up with him.

D & C @ Work
Reply
#17
Oops...wrong thread.
Reply
#18
N-OS X-tasy! wrote:
That's a travesty of justice, ho'. How is that sentence even possible?

for the most part, the only way you get in real trouble for killing someone with a car is if you do it while drunk.
Reply
#19
mattkime wrote:

for the most part, the only way you get in real trouble for killing someone with a car is if you do it while drunk.

Varies by state. Lots of prosecution and jail time here in Colorado for stupid driving and killing a passenger. Though not always.
Reply
#20
Black wrote:
[quote=N-OS X-tasy!]
That's a travesty of justice, ho'. How is that sentence even possible?

The prosecution sucked. The judge was a nutcase.
But in the end the lack of absolute physical proof that the cyclist proceeded on a green light, despite two very strong eyewitness testimonies, got the killer off.
Around here, cyclists don't pay much attention to lights or stop signs, so unfortunately I can see where "reasonable doubt" that the cyclist may have also been in the intersection illegally could be a viable defense for the motorist.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)