Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Campaigning in Colleges... fine. In Classrooms ? Not so fine...
#1
http://www.cleveland.com/opinion/index.s...asses.html

I tend to agree with the opinionator in this piece. Forced campaigning in a department for one candidate or another has no place in a state school (Private schools are another matter, never experienced it in MY college, but Engineering schools tend to be a bit less political). Campaigning ON campus ? Oh yeah, of course, no problem. Young people need to be exposed to different opinions and political options. It's a healthy process, and keeping the dialogue fresh means keeping it healthy.

I fully think that educators should encourage election-age students to register to vote, and to exercise their civic duty. But telling them HOW to vote ? nu-uh. "Vote your conscience, do your research." is the most any good educator should have to say.

My children's 20 something friends often ask me how I will vote, and why. I respectfully decline to answer. I simply encourage them to exercise their minds, review the facts and the promises, and make the decision that they think will best serve them, their friends, families, town, state, country, and the world. In that order.

Telling someone WHAT to do is not teaching them anything. It's dictating and controlling. If you teach your children how to think, they will usually reach the right conclusions (for themselves). I'm quite certain that my children have different political opinions than I do. It's cool.
Reply
#2
While I don't agree with the individual who sent the email, am I missing something? Where are educator's telling their students "HOW" to vote?
Reply
#3
The department chair emailed his instructors to campaign with the Obama campaign.
I do think it's much ado about nothing, but it was worth a short discussion of educating teens about voting without directing them How to vote.
Reply
#4
cbelt3 wrote:
The department chair emailed his instructors to campaign with the Obama campaign.
I do think it's much ado about nothing, but it was worth a short discussion of educating teens about voting without directing them How to vote.

No, the chair emailed them and asked them to consider allowing the reps from the Obama to make a presentation about registering to vote. And also to consider allowing them to make an additional pitch about volunteering for the campaign. Now an argument is made that would be intimidating to non-tenured faculty, but that is weak.

Now, I don't know about that school, but at the college level many department chairs are voluntary positions or voted on by members of the department. Some even have it as a rotating position.

As to the writer, Peter Wood is the executive director of the National Association of Scholars which is a known conservative organization. He is known to exaggerate instances that he claims show the "liberal" slant of higher education. As an example, he makes a big deal in the linked "Memorandum" article that he "blew the whistle" on a similar instance at UMass Amherst in 2008. Facts are in that case that it was a single instructor, who was non-faculty as a chaplain at the university, who proposed to give credits for working for a campaign. The credits had originally been allowed for community service. The university denied the change when it was proposed, it did not take Peter Wood "exposing" it.
Reply
#5
Not sure what Peter Wood or the Nat'l Assn of Scholars has to do with this editorial that cbelt linked.

That writer is George W Dent jr, a prof of law at Case Western. (who is also politically conservative and uses his position to promote conservatives causes, BTW.)
Reply
#6
Not sure what Peter Wood or the Nat'l Assn of Scholars has to do with this editorial that cbelt linked.

Check the linked memorandum.
Reply
#7
August West wrote:
Not sure what Peter Wood or the Nat'l Assn of Scholars has to do with this editorial that cbelt linked.

Check the linked memorandum.

Oh, thanks.

I'm inclined to agree that voter registration drives don't belong in classrooms, though they definitely belong on the campus. What other recruiters do they allow into classrooms? At a huge school like OSU visiting classrooms seems like a really inefficient way to reach a lot of students. Definitely inappropriate - at either public or private schools.
My son is at at private universtity where a majority of students are liberal, but there is no way they'd let campaign operatives in a classroom under those circumstances.
Reply
#8
Put up a table outside the library, maybe. Enter a classroom, no way. McHale should be called to the woodshed for that.
Reply
#9
Agree that the tenure/intimidation argument is overstated almost to silliness, but yes, giving Obama campaign staffers access to classrooms is way out of line.
Reply
#10
Lemon Drop wrote:
Not sure what Peter Wood or the Nat'l Assn of Scholars has to do with this editorial that cbelt linked.

That writer is George W Dent jr, a prof of law at Case Western. (who is also politically conservative and uses his position to promote conservatives causes, BTW.)

Sorry, was meaning say the article's writer was bringing in Peter Wood's posts on the subject as the "authority" about the issue.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)