The writing is on the wall...

[Wild eep]

billb wrote:
What right wing foot soldiers are interested in making " it go away" ?

Seems they have just as much fun posting agenda laced distortions as the left wing foot soldier do their own brand.

Name one poster from the left who posts like "reavers" "Dakota" "bread crumbs" does.

At least the left posters don't hide behind multiple aliases.

[OWC Jamie]

Wild eep wrote:


At least the left posters don't hide behind multiple aliases.

link ?

[hal]

yep - we'll fight over anything!

[cbelt3]

Huh ? How so ?
Well, I can always go tease the juveniles on Reddit some more.

[hal]

cbelt3 wrote:
Huh ? How so ?
Well, I can always go tease the juveniles on Reddit some more.

Larry said that this side of the forum sucks 'resources' (but not monetary resources) and there is no sponsor - the way he said it, it sounds like a situation that he is not happy with.

[Black]

hal wrote:
[quote=cbelt3]
Huh ? How so ?
Well, I can always go tease the juveniles on Reddit some more.

Larry said that this side of the forum sucks 'resources' (but not monetary resources) and there is no sponsor - the way he said it, it sounds like a situation that he is not happy with.
Been meaning to ask all day, but this job gets in the way sometimes-- what exactly does he mean by "sponsors?"

[Black]

Also-- there's an auto-hide feature in place. There's no reason the reports from this side of the forum can't just be ignored. The "sucks resources" statement makes no sense.

[max]

Wild eep wrote:
I'm guessing it was the righties who did the most reporting.
They hate our "Love fest"
Maybe it's a concentrated effort by Appleswitcher to get this closed down to improve membership there.

Both ideas have merit.
Are you implying that Steve G is a rabid right wing nutso, or that he infiltrated FPR as AS' agent provocateur?...

[hal]

Black wrote:
Also-- there's an auto-hide feature in place. There's no reason the reports from this side of the forum can't just be ignored. The "sucks resources" statement makes no sense.

I'm not following it either... Larry said that it isn't a money issue.

Black wrote:
[quote=hal]
[quote=cbelt3]
Huh ? How so ?
Well, I can always go tease the juveniles on Reddit some more.

Larry said that this side of the forum sucks 'resources' (but not monetary resources) and there is no sponsor - the way he said it, it sounds like a situation that he is not happy with.
Been meaning to ask all day, but this job gets in the way sometimes-- what exactly does he mean by "sponsors?"
From the OTHER side:


note that this side has no such sponsor...

[Black]

hal wrote:
[quote=Black]
Also-- there's an auto-hide feature in place. There's no reason the reports from this side of the forum can't just be ignored. The "sucks resources" statement makes no sense.

I'm not following it either... Larry said that it isn't a money issue.

Black wrote:
[quote=hal]
[quote=cbelt3]
Huh ? How so ?
Well, I can always go tease the juveniles on Reddit some more.

Larry said that this side of the forum sucks 'resources' (but not monetary resources) and there is no sponsor - the way he said it, it sounds like a situation that he is not happy with.
Been meaning to ask all day, but this job gets in the way sometimes-- what exactly does he mean by "sponsors?"
From the OTHER side:


note that this side has no such sponsor... I'm sorry, I can't believe that's what is meant. If the main forum was broken out into subfora, would each need its own sponsor?