05-07-2013, 04:17 PM
The "official report" (ARB) is under review because it was not complete. How can you have an "official report" when the ARB was a product of the State Department reviewing the State Department? (Fox guardig the hen house?) How can you have an official report when they did not interview any people that were on the ground that night in Benghazi?
As far as Benghazi being political. That be came obvious when the administration persisted in the YouTube video story even when it was known from the beginning of the attack that it was in fact terrorists? The "script" was scrubbed to delete references to AQ in order to fit the pretender-in-chief's campaign line that AQ was on its heels. THAT is pretty dang political and even some Democrats are realizing what Hillary and Obummer's staffs did.
Nobody has been held responsible or accountable (R or D). Except for Hillary, everyone in the State Department connected with the fiasco still have SD jobs. Obummer promised swift justice, but nobody's been captured yet except the American who made the video (you DO remember free speech, don't you?) and is still in jail in California.
The families of the fallen still have no real answers and the whistleblowers (who say they were under threats not to talk) are laying their lives and fortunes on the line in order to find the truth of what went wrong. A military security team that was stationed in Tripoli (200 miles away) were told NOT to board the Libyan C-130 aircraft headed to Benghazi during the attack. Who made that decision?
We have people in this forum who claim to be intelligent and inpartial. Fine, but aren't you guys even curious about what happened? Are you saying that you don't care about being lied to by your government or gross incompetence getting a pass?
I really don't expect the press to give it much coverage other than to make more excuses for the administration. Because Carney told them "it was a long time ago" Hillary doesn't think it matters (we have no time line on her involvement that night) and we know Obummer went to bed without following up on the crisis that night (he had to get his beauty sleep before a big campaign speech the next day).
Stay tuned for the next chapter.
As far as Benghazi being political. That be came obvious when the administration persisted in the YouTube video story even when it was known from the beginning of the attack that it was in fact terrorists? The "script" was scrubbed to delete references to AQ in order to fit the pretender-in-chief's campaign line that AQ was on its heels. THAT is pretty dang political and even some Democrats are realizing what Hillary and Obummer's staffs did.
Nobody has been held responsible or accountable (R or D). Except for Hillary, everyone in the State Department connected with the fiasco still have SD jobs. Obummer promised swift justice, but nobody's been captured yet except the American who made the video (you DO remember free speech, don't you?) and is still in jail in California.
The families of the fallen still have no real answers and the whistleblowers (who say they were under threats not to talk) are laying their lives and fortunes on the line in order to find the truth of what went wrong. A military security team that was stationed in Tripoli (200 miles away) were told NOT to board the Libyan C-130 aircraft headed to Benghazi during the attack. Who made that decision?
We have people in this forum who claim to be intelligent and inpartial. Fine, but aren't you guys even curious about what happened? Are you saying that you don't care about being lied to by your government or gross incompetence getting a pass?
I really don't expect the press to give it much coverage other than to make more excuses for the administration. Because Carney told them "it was a long time ago" Hillary doesn't think it matters (we have no time line on her involvement that night) and we know Obummer went to bed without following up on the crisis that night (he had to get his beauty sleep before a big campaign speech the next day).
Stay tuned for the next chapter.