So... since “OathKeepers” is obviously a poorly regulated militia...

[cbelt3]

Should they still be allowed to bear arms ?

I’d personally like to release the angry bears on them.

[bfd]

The meaning of the 2nd Amendment has been stretched so far that it really "bears almost no resemblance" to the writers' original intent.

[rjmacs]

Militias other than the national guard are illegal nationwide, so no - they shouldn't be allowed to exist as a militia at all.

[hal]

rjmacs wrote:
Militias other than the national guard are illegal nationwide, so no - they shouldn't be allowed to exist as a militia at all.

is that true? But, of course, it's perfectly ok for a bunch of guys/gals to get together, shoot a bunch of guns, train for violent encounters and talk about the day when the gov't comes for their guns etc...

[rjmacs]

hal wrote:
[quote=rjmacs]
Militias other than the national guard are illegal nationwide, so no - they shouldn't be allowed to exist as a militia at all.

is that true? But, of course, it's perfectly ok for a bunch of guys/gals to get together, shoot a bunch of guns, train for violent encounters and talk about the day when the gov't comes for their guns etc...
Yes, it's true.