What does The Orange Fool have on his rivals?

[sekker]

There is no other explanation for this continued irrational support of the treasonous former President.

[Lizabeth]

They drank too much of his Koolaid.

[DeusxMac]

He has the “deplorables’” votes, and many (most?) Republicans covet those votes; many must have them to remain in office.

[Ombligo]

DeusxMac wrote:
He has the “deplorables’” votes, and many (most?) Republicans covet those votes; many must have them to remain in office.

DING DING DING - we have a winner

[sekker]

Ombligo wrote:
[quote=DeusxMac]
He has the “deplorables’” votes, and many (most?) Republicans covet those votes; many must have them to remain in office.

DING DING DING - we have a winner
Is that really enough?

Call me skeptical.

[DinerDave]

Lizabeth wrote:
They drank too much of his Koolaid.

We need and antidote.

Dave

[Sarcany]

sekker wrote:
[quote=Ombligo]
[quote=DeusxMac]
He has the “deplorables’” votes, and many (most?) Republicans covet those votes; many must have them to remain in office.

DING DING DING - we have a winner
Is that really enough?
That and the Russian SVR at his disposal.

He's not the only one with a "pee tape."

[Lizabeth]

DinerDave wrote:
[quote=Lizabeth]
They drank too much of his Koolaid.

We need and antidote.

Dave
Bleach? Sorry bad joke but couldn’t help myself...

[DeusxMac]

sekker wrote:
[quote=Ombligo]
[quote=DeusxMac]
He has the “deplorables’” votes, and many (most?) Republicans covet those votes; many must have them to remain in office.

DING DING DING - we have a winner
Is that really enough?

Call me skeptical.
Sutton's Law: "...when diagnosing, one should first consider the obvious"

and...

Occam's Razor: "...simply, the simplest explanation is usually the right one."

[sekker]

DeusxMac wrote:
[quote=sekker]
[quote=Ombligo]
[quote=DeusxMac]
He has the “deplorables’” votes, and many (most?) Republicans covet those votes; many must have them to remain in office.

DING DING DING - we have a winner
Is that really enough?

Call me skeptical.
Sutton's Law: "...when diagnosing, one should first consider the obvious"

and...

Occam's Razor: "...simply, the simplest explanation is usually the right one."
Ok, if that's true - which I acknowledge might be right - who is REALLY pulling the strings on the Base? I do not believe it's all 'grassroots'.