Posts: 68,304
Threads: 17,202
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
1
....they've thrown the case out......they said the states did not have the legal merit for the case.......7 to 2......
....so 'Obama Care' survives again.....
_____________________________________
I reject your reality and substitute my own!
Posts: 23,019
Threads: 575
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
2
Posts: 25,452
Threads: 2,519
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
0
Posts: 4,226
Threads: 689
Joined: May 2025
They'll run on repealing it forever, like abortion.
Posts: 27,160
Threads: 2,805
Joined: May 2025
Trump's picks split, only Gorsuch joined Alito in dissent. Barrett and Kavanaugh joined the rest to toss the case out.
Posts: 32,462
Threads: 3,127
Joined: Apr 2025
Reputation:
0
Quote of the day, via Twitter:
“ ... it remains, as ever, a BFD. “
- Joseph R. Biden
Yes Mr. President, it sure is.
Posts: 57,776
Threads: 5,855
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
2
The finding can be summarized :
"Due to changes in the Law, the plaintiffs were not harmed, so they have no standing to bring this before the court."
Or
"No money, no problem"
https://amylhowe.com/2021/06/17/court-ag...-in-place/
"The individual plaintiffs, Breyer explained, contended that they are harmed, and therefore have a right to sue, because they have to pay each month for health insurance to comply with the mandate. The problem with that argument, Breyer reasoned, is that although the ACA instructs them to obtain health insurance, the Internal Revenue Service can no longer impose a penalty on taxpayers who fail to obtain insurance – and there is no other government action connected to the harm that the individual plaintiffs claim to have suffered, a key requirement for standing."
Posts: 5,342
Threads: 162
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
0
cbelt3 wrote:
The finding can be summarized :
"Due to changes in the Law, the plaintiffs were not harmed, so they have no standing to bring this before the court."
Or
"No money, no problem"
https://amylhowe.com/2021/06/17/court-ag...-in-place/
"The individual plaintiffs, Breyer explained, contended that they are harmed, and therefore have a right to sue, because they have to pay each month for health insurance to comply with the mandate. The problem with that argument, Breyer reasoned, is that although the ACA instructs them to obtain health insurance, the Internal Revenue Service can no longer impose a penalty on taxpayers who fail to obtain insurance – and there is no other government action connected to the harm that the individual plaintiffs claim to have suffered, a key requirement for standing."
Hoist on their own petard, anyone?
Posts: 32,462
Threads: 3,127
Joined: Apr 2025
Reputation:
0
They thought they’d chip away at it and instead all they did was delete the thing that could have given them standing. And now they’re trapped. It’s actually kinda awesome.
Posts: 22,486
Threads: 4,932
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
2
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/17/upsho...tion=click&module=Well&pgtype=Homepage§ion=The%20Upshot
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Efforts_to...e_Care_Act
"After the July 27, 2017 vote on the Health Care Freedom Act, Newsweek "found at least 70 Republican-led attempts to repeal, modify or otherwise curb the Affordable Care Act since its inception as law on March 23, 2010."
https://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2...0464914248
Health Insurers Secretly Spent Huge To Defeat Health Care Reform While Pretending To Support Obamacare
"A stunning $102.4 million spent over just 15 months."
“Art is how we decorate space.
Music is how we decorate time.”
Jean-Michel Basquiat
|