Trump indicted again.

[N-OS X-tasy!]

rgG wrote:
[quote=Lemon Drop]
[quote=pdq]
Don’t pick on my (still Blue) former state! Send him to South Dakota!

He should have to move in with Sarah Huckabee Sanders.

Oooooo, that’s cold.
Much like a typical South Dakota winter.

[wurm]

...prison would be too hard for the Secret Service to watch him.

I don't understand this. How can it not be easy? He can't go anywhere...except the yard, right? Or making license plates. Or doing laundry. Or washing dishes. Consider it one gigantic home confinement since that should be his new home.

[$tevie]

wurm wrote:
...prison would be too hard for the Secret Service to watch him.

I don't understand this. How can it not be easy? He can't go anywhere...except the yard, right? Or making license plates. Or doing laundry. Or washing dishes. Consider it one gigantic home confinement since that should be his new home.

I don't think that it is about it being too hard as in difficult. It would be too hard as in Secret Service agents having to basically function as prison guards, and be in prison, which is in no way what they signed up for. It would probably mean a lot of people bailing from their jobs, I'll bet.

[jonny]

What Makes Jack Smith’s New Trump Indictment So Smart

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/02/opini...WrR6Kmzehg&smid=url-share

[Acer]

The judge for this trial will need to run the tightest ship in the history of jurisprudence.

[GGD]

$tevie wrote:
[quote=wurm]
...prison would be too hard for the Secret Service to watch him.

I don't understand this. How can it not be easy? He can't go anywhere...except the yard, right? Or making license plates. Or doing laundry. Or washing dishes. Consider it one gigantic home confinement since that should be his new home.

I don't think that it is about it being too hard as in difficult. It would be too hard as in Secret Service agents having to basically function as prison guards, and be in prison, which is in no way what they signed up for. It would probably mean a lot of people bailing from their jobs, I'll bet.
Which side of the bars would they need to be on? If they're on the inside with PAB45, then wouldn't they need to be unarmed.

[AllGold]

I figured Boris Epshteyn would figure into this, but I'm surprised he is not designated in the indictment as "an attorney" rather than a political consultant--because he is an attorney.

[RgrF]

GGD wrote:
[quote=$tevie]
[quote=wurm]
...prison would be too hard for the Secret Service to watch him.

I don't understand this. How can it not be easy? He can't go anywhere...except the yard, right? Or making license plates. Or doing laundry. Or washing dishes. Consider it one gigantic home confinement since that should be his new home.

I don't think that it is about it being too hard as in difficult. It would be too hard as in Secret Service agents having to basically function as prison guards, and be in prison, which is in no way what they signed up for. It would probably mean a lot of people bailing from their jobs, I'll bet.
Which side of the bars would they need to be on? If they're on the inside with PAB45, then wouldn't they need to be unarmed.
Unless responding to a situation, prison guards don't go in armed.