7 days remaining until Obama disqualification

[karsen]

MacGurl, what's with the dragons? Why are some blurry and others not?

[MacGurl]

Humm, they should all be fine right now, but sometimes I have to hide the new ones behind a veil of fog when they first hatch (it's a temporary thing). Is that what you mean?

Kathy

[karsen]

Yeah. It looked like a thumbprint. But yeah, fog. I see it now.

Do you airbrush primarily dragons? or all sorts of things?

[Bill in NC]

I'm still waiting for swampy to provide a legal argument why the Virginia case (where the court found el presidente-elect is a natural born citizen) won't be cited by other courts in their dismissal.

[JoeH]

swampy wrote:
Here's yet another well stated case for bringing this before the courts.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/11/w...h_cer.html

And, just released, is a video of Dr. Ron Polarik explaining the technicalities of his finding that the Obamasmears and FactCheck Birth Certificates are frauds.

http://www.nmatv.com/video/427/Dr-Ron-Po...bamas-COLB

That's nice, but apparently Ron Polarik does not exist and there is no person with real credentials that match "Ron's". He has provided no credentials that actually show he has the degree and the skills he claims. The first sign of "Ron" comes up with his posts questioning the authenticity of the birth certificate. However a real expert in the field, with credentials that can be looked up and verified, has examined "Ron's" claims and find there is no basis for his conclusions, and in fact that they are based on misunderstandings of proper authentication and bad procedure. I'll put his analysis out for those who will actually read it, not that I expect it will matter to swampy.

http://hackerfactor.com/blog/index.php?%...rt-II.html

[Gutenberg]

So now we want to see Ron Polarik's birth certificate and school records? OK, fine.

[MacGurl]

karsen wrote:
Yeah. It looked like a thumbprint. But yeah, fog. I see it now.

Do you airbrush primarily dragons? or all sorts of things?

Here's what I do - http://www.dragonflightstudio.com/
The dragons are just a fun online "game" I play.

Kathy

[swampy]

Joe, Here's a link to Ron Polarik's Blog... take it or leave it.

Charles Johnson doesn't have all the digital imaging credentials either, but his proof that Dan Rather's documentation of Bush's military service was bogus brought Rather to his knees. Are you saying that only people on the left have the "credentials" to prove or disprove a document?

Watch Charles' 'throbbing.gif' here

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killian_documents

[Dennis S]

Swampy, do you want to know why you're subject to ridicule and called names? I'll give it to you straight. You're a nut.

[Gutenberg]

swampy wrote:
Joe, Here's a link to Ron Polarik's Blog... take it or leave it.

Why should he? He has given you the courtesy of explaining his objections to "Polarik's" argument. That there is a blog with the name "Polarik" on it does not mean that Polarik exists.

Try answering some people's questions instead of merely repeating yourself, and you may gain some credibility.

swampy wrote:
Charles Johnson doesn't have all the digital imaging credentials either, but his proof that Dan Rather's documentation of Bush's military service was bogus brought Rather to his knees. Are you saying that only people on the left have the "credentials" to prove or disprove a document?

Joe never said that. Stop putting words in people's mouths. If you have such wonderful proof, put it out there--but keep in mind that when one right wing blog repeats another's claim, it doesn't make the claim true.

swampy wrote:
Watch Charles' 'throbbing.gif' here

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killian_documents

Once again, why should he?