ARRESTED development!. . .Sarah Palin's pregnant daughter's BF's mother arrested. . .

[Black Landlord]

I guess I'd like it if you would try to react to the content and subject matter of the -individual- posts rather than getting stuck on this "defending the poor outnumbered underdog" thing.
I get that, I really do.
But it seems like more and more you're taking the side of people who harrass and lie and willfully misconstrue and most of the time are only looking for a pound of flesh, and have no interest in learning or exploring or getting closer to any sort of truth.

[mikeylikesit]

Moi?

[kj]

mikeylikesit wrote:
How kj equates the actual impeachment of Clinton for actions that were not the affairs of state to the call to impeach Bush for malfeasance in affairs of state really says it all.

He seems to think those calling for a Bush impeachment are all revengeful Democrats upset they weren't occupying the White House and has nothing to to with his actions, lies, missteps and plain incompetence as a chief executive.

Equivocation isn't a viable political or civil position to use as a life guideline.

I pretty much agree with what you're saying about the issue Rog. But I think the popularity of the phrase, the bumper stickers, and the idea have more to do with payback for most people. The payback thing keeps on and on coming up. It's not just my example. kj.

[kj]

Black Landlord wrote:
I guess I'd like it if you would try to react to the content and subject matter of the -individual- posts rather than getting stuck on this "defending the poor outnumbered underdog" thing.
I get that, I really do.

Ok, sure. I'll try.

Black Landlord wrote:
But it seems like more and more you're taking the side of people who harrass and lie and willfully misconstrue and most of the time are only looking for a pound of flesh, and have no interest in learning or exploring or getting closer to any sort of truth.

I don't see anyone here who fits your description. At least any more than anyone else. But like I've said, there are a few more conservatives around here, and I'm glad, whether you or anyone else likes their views, tactics, etc. or not. Btw, when's the last time you've taken Wags, Dennis, or any of the other venomous "lefties" to task? Davester's the only one I've seen do it (and I appreciate it, for whatever little it's worth). kj.

[freeradical]

Black Landlord wrote:
I think what happens is you are so averse to the "dogpack" mentality that you don't 'join the fray' by taking a stance against vicious, racist, aggressive communication from swampy, dakota, DP, freeradical and the like

That is pathetic. You owe me an apology.

[mikeylikesit]

freeradical wrote:
[quote=Black Landlord]
I think what happens is you are so averse to the "dogpack" mentality that you don't 'join the fray' by taking a stance against vicious, racist, aggressive communication from swampy, dakota, DP, freeradical and the like

That is pathetic. You owe me an apology.
You're a partisan asshat. No one owes you anything but derision for the stances you've taken.

[Greg the dogsitter]

mikeylikesit wrote:
[quote=freeradical]
[quote=Black Landlord]
I think what happens is you are so averse to the "dogpack" mentality that you don't 'join the fray' by taking a stance against vicious, racist, aggressive communication from swampy, dakota, DP, freeradical and the like

That is pathetic. You owe me an apology.
You're a partisan asshat. No one owes you anything but derision for the stances you've taken.
THIS IS NOT THE POLITENESS WE'RE REFERRING TO. :-)

[mikeylikesit]

I know.

[Greg the dogsitter]

mikeylikesit wrote:
I know.

:-)

[Black Landlord]

freeradical wrote:
[quote=Black Landlord]
I think what happens is you are so averse to the "dogpack" mentality that you don't 'join the fray' by taking a stance against vicious, racist, aggressive communication from swampy, dakota, DP, freeradical and the like

That is pathetic. You owe me an apology.
OK, I'm sorry I wasn't clear-- I don't specifically recall any past racist comments from you specifically.