04-16-2009, 01:58 PM
billb wrote:
in the same room of irrelevants as Gore.
Gore Vidal?
When did Howard Stern (radio personality not bombshell model enabler) become irrelevant
|
04-16-2009, 01:58 PM
billb wrote: Gore Vidal?
04-16-2009, 02:30 PM
volcs0 wrote:Yeah, sorta like pay TV. Who would pay for TV? I used to think that paying for radio is silly as well. When I lived in an area that I could no longer receive local radio (the stations I wanted to hear) clearly and the stations that I DID get, sucked, we opted for Sirius in one of our cars. I was hooked. I paid for a lifetime subscription in that car and when we bought a new car last year, we did the same for XM in that car. No static, tons of variety and no commercials on most stations. I LOVE being able to listen to CNN when I drive around. Yes, it was not free, but as long as Sirius/XM will be around, I am a customer.
04-16-2009, 02:34 PM
He has N E V E R been relevant for me.
:mullet:
04-16-2009, 02:46 PM
Spock wrote: Gore Vidal? Leslie Gore?
04-16-2009, 02:54 PM
john dough wrote: I barely have time to catch up on 1/3rd of my podcasts in the car.
04-16-2009, 03:14 PM
I guess if you live out in the sticks, satellite radio is a good option. But, as Doc says, I barely have time to listen to my stack of CDs (from house or library) and I don't even get around to many podcasts. I also live in one of the best radio markets in the country for variety so we are never lacking on the dial.
04-16-2009, 03:40 PM
I stopped hearing about him after he went to satellite radio.
I never listen to any radio these days.
04-16-2009, 05:27 PM
"When was he relevant?"
"pay radio. i just can't process that." "He has N E V E R been relevant for me." My thoughts, exactly.
04-16-2009, 05:42 PM
Funny how such "irrelevancy" gets so many views and responses.
04-16-2009, 06:05 PM
You're confusing "popular" with "relevant".
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|