06-22-2011, 04:39 PM
San Francisco is considering this again. This time the proposed ban will include goldfish...
I say no way...
I say no way...
Should the sale of pets be banned?
|
06-22-2011, 04:39 PM
San Francisco is considering this again. This time the proposed ban will include goldfish...
I say no way...
06-22-2011, 04:43 PM
.....only for those who go overboard.....any sort of heavy PETTING.....should be banned......
_____________________________________
I reject your reality and substitute my own!
06-22-2011, 04:48 PM
Why would they do this?
06-22-2011, 04:48 PM
a little more background here is necessary -
the Animal Control Commission is only wanting to ban the act of a pet 'sale' in an effort to increase pet adoptions. You can still have and enjoy your dog/cat/fish I'm all for this in an effort to dispel the act of pet farmers and puppy mill breeders. Unfortunately, I believe this will have a minimal effect and drive the pet sales underground.
06-22-2011, 04:54 PM
Wouldn't this force pet stores to move out to the suburbs?
And there's the slippery slope - when is an animal considered a pet species? (as opposed to livestock)
06-22-2011, 04:55 PM
evilrobot wrote: I'm all for this in an effort to dispel the act of pet farmers and puppy mill breeders. Unfortunately, I believe this will have a minimal effect and drive the pet sales underground. Or to neighboring cities... SF is pretty small.
06-22-2011, 04:55 PM
They should be banned only in San Francisco.
And McDonalds should start including a baby salmonella laden turtle as the toy in every Happy Meal.
06-22-2011, 05:06 PM
those cute little pet stores in the Mall that are outlets for the puppy mill operations ?
Yeah, outlaw them. heck, while you're at it ban Malls. :-) seriously, this is an attempt at putting the kibosh on impulse sales of cute little animals that end up abandoned and costing the city an arm and a leg for incineration costs, right ?
06-22-2011, 05:06 PM
I'm happy to see someone trying to tackle the issue, even in a flawed manner. (not sure if it is or not)
animal control is in charge of discarding unwanted pets. we shouldn't produce more pets than have homes. there are a number of different steps that should be regulated. we treat animals very poorly in this country (which isn't to say that we're the worst!)
06-22-2011, 05:08 PM
The road to hell is paved.....
Just include a mandatory "Shelter tax" of $10 per four legged pet. Add a 'core charge' deposit of $100 for spay/neuter (payable to a vet or clinic). Then use the funds to allow lower cost adoptions. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|